Sunday, October 2, 2016

School Buses




School buses
Dale G. Larrimore, Esquire

            Passing a school bus — do you know the rules? Another school year has started. Perhaps it is a good time for a refresher.
The rule that every driver should know is that you must stop whenever a school bus is stopped to allow children to board or leave the bus. That is the easy part. It becomes more difficult deciding exactly when stops are required and how far back you need to stop. When a school bus is stopped on the road with its red signal lights flashing and the side stop signal arms activated, the operator of any vehicle overtaking the bus or meeting it when coming in the opposite direction must stop at least ten feet before reaching the school bus and must remain stopped until the school children who have gotten off the bus have reached a place of safety.[1]  A motorist is not required to stop until the red flashers on the school bus have been activated, since a motorist cannot know whether it is stopped to discharge or receive school children without such notice.[2]  The concern, of course, is that a child may cut across all traffic lanes to board, or after leaving, the bus. The driver cannot proceed until the red lights quit flashing and every child going to or from the bus has reached a point of safety.
What if you are on a motorcycle or a bicycle? That counts. The key word here is vehicle. Both are considered to be vehicles under the Pennsylvania Vehicle Code.
            Now here is the question that probably creates the most confusion for drivers. What do you do when the bus is approaching you from the opposite direction on a multi-lane roadway? When do you have to stop and when don’t you? It is important to recognize that the above rule does not apply to divided highways. So what is a divided highway?
Where there are “separate roadways,” a driver is not required to stop on meeting or passing a school bus with active red signals that is on a different roadway.[3] A “separate roadway” is defined in the Pennsylvania Code to be a highway that is divided into two or more roadways, with a physical barrier or clearly indicated dividing section between the roadways.[4] To qualify as a separate roadway, there must be a physical barrier or a clearly indicated dividing section separating the two halves. Physical barriers include a concrete median barrier, metal median barrier and non-mountable curbing. Clearly indicated dividing sections include concrete mountable curbs, trees, shrubs, rocks, boulders, a stream or grass. But mere pavement markings or “singing divisors” do not create separate roadways. (Yes, those rumble strips on the road are called singing divisors). Two painted double yellow lines separating the northbound lanes from the southbound lanes are not a physical barrier and the driver of a northbound vehicle can be convicted of passing a stop school bus that is in the southbound lane with the lights and stop signal arm activated.[5]
One might think that if you are not sure, you should just stop. However, where a school bus heading east on a four lane divided highway stopped to discharge children, a motorist who was driving in the westbound lanes was found to be negligent in stopping after his vehicle was then hit in the rear.[6]
What about school buses stopped at an intersection? The driver of a vehicle approaching an intersection at which a school bus is stopped must stop his vehicle at that intersection until the flashing red signal lights are no longer actuated.
School buses, or actually their passengers, have special protection provided through the Vehicle Code, and violating the rules with regard to passing a school bus is considered a “serious traffic offense.”[7] A violation can mean a fine of $100, a 60-day suspension of driving privileges and five points on the driver's record.
The statute mandating that motorists stop no less than ten feet before reaching a stopped school bus with its red signal lights flashing and the side signal arm extended, has been very strictly interpreted to favor the children of our Commonwealth. Although a motorist is not required to stop unless the red flashers on the school bus are in operation, a driver cannot excuse a failure to stop by arguing that she could not see the flashing lights due to their angle of view or other obstruction.[8]
The operator of a school bus is empowered by the Vehicle Code to report to the police any motorist who passes a stopped school bus, and the police may then issue a citation based on such a report.[9] When a school bus driver initiates legal action against a motorist for passing a stopped school bus, the bus driver must do so by filing a signed, written report including information pertaining to the identity of the alleged violator, the license number, color and body type of the vehicle, and the time and location of the violation.[10] The report of the school bus operator must be filed with the citation issued by the police.[11]
            We commonly recognize that school buses are painted yellow, but the Vehicle Code actually only mandates that they be painted with a “uniform color scheme,” with the label “School Bus” on both the front and rear.[12] Under the Vehicle Code of Pennsylvania, a school bus is any vehicle used to carry 11 passengers or more for the transportation of school students to or from schools or school-related activities.[13] When a school bus is being used for purposes other than the actual transportation of children to or from school or in connection with school activities, all markings indicating “school bus” must be covered and the driver may not use the flashing visual signals.[14]
            Every school bus must have its headlights on during the entire period that the school bus is in operation.[15] Every school bus operated in Pennsylvania must be equipped with a side stop signal arm, on the left side of the vehicle, with a flashing red light connected to the same circuits as the red visual signals on the bus and automatically activated whenever the bus is stopped with the red visual signals in use.[16] School buses must also be equipped with a crossing control arm on the front of the vehicle that is automatically activated whenever the bus is stopped with the red visual signals in use.[17] A mirror must be located on the front of the bus to permit the driver to see any pedestrian in front of the bus, along with rear view mirrors sufficient to provide the operator with a proper view of the sides and rear of the bus. Where a bus failed to have such equipment, and this failure was a proximate cause of an accident that resulted in the death of a child, the bus company may be guilty of homicide by vehicle.[18]
            The operator of a school bus on any trafficway is required to actuate the amber visual signals at a point not more than 300 feet nor less than 150 feet prior to making a stop to pick up or discharge school children. The amber signals may not be used by a bus driver unless the red visual signals are to be actuated immediately following, and the amber signals must remain in operation until the red visual signals are actuated.[19] The driver of any other vehicle meeting or overtaking a school bus on the same roadway with the amber visual signals actuated must proceed past the school bus with caution and be prepared to stop when the red signals are flashing.[20]
Because of the highly increased potential for tragedy should a school bus accident occur, the Department of Transportation has created special licensing requirements for operators and these are accepted as rational safety precautions.[21] School Bus drivers must complete a special course of instruction and pass an annual physical examination in order to remain qualified to operate these vehicles.[22]

For a more thorough and detailed analysis of Pennsylvania vehicle law concerning school buses, see Dale G. Larrimore, Pennsylvania Rules of the Road, Section 8:7, (West’s Pennsylvania Practice Series, Vol. 13) (2015-2016 edition).



[1] 75 Pa.C.S. §3345(a).
[2] Com. v. Bream, 73 Pa. D. & C.2d 110, (C.P. 1975).
[3] 75 Pa.C.S. §3345(g).
[4] 67 Pa. Code §104.2.
[5] Com. v. Russell, 784 A.2d 165 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2001).
[6] Bradley's Guardian v. Ritchie, 57 Lanc. L.R. 129 (Pa. C.P. 1960).
[7] 75 Pa.C.S. §3101(b) and 75 Pa.C.S. §3345.
[8] Com. v. Zankowski, 546 A.2d 1254 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1988).
[9] 75 Pa.C.S. §3345(a.1).
[10] Com. v. Fulmer, 621 A.2d 146 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1993).
[11] Id.
[12] 75 Pa.C.S. §4552(a).
[13] 75 Pa.C.S. §102.
[14] 75 Pa.C.S. §3345(f).
[15] 75 Pa.C.S. §4308.
[16] 75 Pa.C.S. §4552(b.1).
[17] 75 Pa.C.S. §4552(b.2)
[18] Com. v. McIlwain School Bus Lines, Inc., 423 A.2d 413 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1980).
[19] 75 Pa.C.S. §3345(d).
[20] 75 Pa.C.S. §3345(b).
[21] See 67 Pa. Code §§71.1 et seq.
[22] 75 Pa.C.S. §1509; Com., Dept. of Transp., Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Johnson, 478 A.2d 521 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1984).

Tuesday, September 6, 2016

Left Turns and the Law



Left Turns and the Law
Dale G. Larrimore, Esquire



            Under the Vehicle Code of Pennsylvania, drivers have three basic obligations when making a left turn. First, such turns must be made from the lane farthest to the left for traffic moving in the driver's direction of travel.[1] Second, a motorist must make a plainly visible signal of the intention to turn left, and the signal must be given far enough in advance of the turn to give an approaching motorist an opportunity to react to the warning.[2] Third, motorists making a left turn must yield the right of way to any oncoming vehicle that is “so close as to constitute a hazard.”[3] The first two duties are relatively straightforward, but the third requirement is what is the cause of most accidents and the centerpiece of most litigation arising out of left turn crashes.
            Making a left turn across oncoming lanes of traffic is a movement that is fraught with peril. While it seems obvious that a car cannot make a sudden turn in front of another vehicle, the issue of when a vehicle is “so close as to constitute a hazard” is one that is hard to define. Courts have often noted that the act of colliding with a vehicle approaching in the opposite direction while turning left is a factual indication that the oncoming vehicle was too close to turn in front of without constituting a hazard. And, certainly, if a motorist fails to look for oncoming traffic just before entering the intersection and then makes a left turn and strikes another vehicle, this is sufficient to infer that the motorist violated his duty to yield the right-of-way.[4]
Turning motorists do have the right to assume that the driver of another vehicle, who might be outside of their range of vision and coming from the opposite direction, will fulfill his or her legal duty and observe the restricted speed limit on the roadway. The turning motorist is not required to “anticipate and guard against the want of ordinary care on the part of another,” or to assume that another will “flagrantly violate the statutory speed limit.”[5] One court justified this standard by finding that “if the mere suggestion of a tire on the horizon is to instill apprehension and fear into all others using the highway, all traffic will freeze to a standstill.”[6] But in a situation where there is no allegation or evidence that the non-turning vehicle was speeding, and where there is evidence that a collision took place a “split second” after the motorist began his or her turn, then a court may reasonably conclude that the turning motorist began the turn when the non-turning vehicle was almost upon his or her vehicle.[7]
            Before making a left turn, a motorist must look for an oncoming vehicle and “a driver of a vehicle cannot claim to have looked when he has failed to see what the physical facts declare he should have seen.”[8] A court cannot ignore certain facts that demonstrate that the negligence of a driver was an actual real factor in causing an accident, such as making a left turn in front of an oncoming vehicle only 40 to 50 feet away.[9] Where a driver cannot see far enough into an oncoming lane to proceed into the road safely, it remains incumbent on the person entering into the through road to continue to look down the lane to be crossed as he or she proceeds into the roadway.[10]
            A motorist must exercise special precautions while attempting a left turn in weather that significantly reduces visibility and requires the motorist to make the turn at a very low rate of speed. The overriding duty of reasonableness mandates that a motorist making a turn in such weather conditions take extra precautions to make sure that the turn can be made safely and without interfering with oncoming traffic.[11]
            Pennsylvania courts have also discussed the duties of vehicle operators who encounter a vehicle turning left into their path of travel. A driver approaching an intersection has a right to assume that a motorist approaching from the opposite direction will not, without adequate warning, suddenly turn across a roadway in front of the driver.[12] Generally, drivers do not have to anticipate the negligence of other drivers and motorists approaching an intersection are not required to predict that a vehicle that has given no notice or insufficient notice of turning will negligently attempt to cross their path of travel.
            When a driver is stopped, waiting to make a left turn across oncoming lanes of traffic, an oncoming motorist may sometimes wave the turning car on, signaling that the turning motorist should proceed in front of the stopped oncoming vehicle. Our courts have recognized that such a signal “might be considered simply an invitation to allow the turning driver to pass in front of the signaler, or that it might be safe to pass all the way through the intersection.”[13] A hand signal may be nothing more than an invitation to pass when safe, and not a command to pass or an “all clear” signal.”[14] On the other hand, where the turning driver indicates that she saw the signaling motorist look in his rear view mirror to check whether any cars were coming and that she saw the signaling motorist wave to her three times and repeatedly mouth to her “come on,” then, under a “totality of the circumstances” analysis, it is for the jury or fact finder to determine the significance to be reasonably attributed to the hand signal of the oncoming motorist.[15]
            For a more thorough and detailed analysis of Pennsylvania law concerning left turns and the operation of vehicles through intersections, see Dale G. Larrimore, Pennsylvania Rules of the Road, chapters 3 and 4, (West’s Pennsylvania Practice Series, Vol. 13)(2015-2016).


[1] 75 Pa.C.S. §3331(b).
[2] 75 Pa.C.S. §3334(b); Silfies v. American Stores Co., 357 Pa. 176, 53 A.2d 610 (1947).
[3] 75 Pa.C.S. §3322.
[4] Eagleson v. Malone, 465 A.2d 1280 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1983).
[5] Halbach v. Robinson Bros., 98 A.2d 750, 755 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1953).
[6] Flank v. Walker, 398 Pa. 166, 169, 157 A.2d 163, 166 (1960).
[7] Ditz v. Marshall, 393 A.2d 701 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1978).
[8] Hoover v. Sackett, 292 A.2d 461, 463 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1972).
[9] Craft v. Hetherly, 700 A.2d 520, 524 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1997).
[10] Klein v. Hollings, 992 F.2d 1285 (3d Cir.1993).
[11] Poltorak v. Sandy, 345 A.2d 201 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1975).
[12] Abee v. Stamm, 272 F. Supp. 406 (W.D. Pa. 1967).
[13] Askew By Askew v. Zeller, 521 A.2d 459 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1987).
[14] Keating v. Belcher, 384 Pa. 129, 119 A.2d 535 (1956).
[15] Erie Ins. Co. v. Williams, 855 A.2d 59 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2004).